Hepatectomy For Colorectal Liver Metastases Research Articles

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on short-term outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score matched and coarsened exact matched study

BackgroundIn the last three decades, minimally invasive liver resection has been replacing conventional open approach in liver surgery. More recently, developments in neoadjuvant chemotherapy have led to increased multidisciplinary management of colorectal liver metastases with both medical and surgical treatment modalities. However, the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive liver resections remains poorly understood. MethodsA multicenter, international, database of 4998 minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases was used to compare surgical outcomes in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone. To correct for baseline imbalance, propensity score matching, coarsened exact matching and inverse probability treatment weighting were performed. Results2546 patients met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching there were 759 patients in both groups and 383 patients in both groups after coarsened exact matching. Baseline characteristics were equal after both matching strategies. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with statistically significant worse surgical outcomes of minimally invasive minor hepatectomy. ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy had no statistically significant impact on short-term surgical outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

Debulking hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: Analysis of risk factors for progression free survival

BackgroundThe study explores the role of liver debulking surgery in cases of unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), challenging the traditional notion that surgery is not a valid option in such scenarios. Materials and methodsPatients with advanced but resectable disease who underwent surgery with a curative intent (Group I) and those with advanced incompletely resectable disease who underwent a “debulking” hepatectomy (Group II) were compared. ResultsThere was no difference in the intra-operative and post-operative results between the two groups. The 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 69% and 47% for group 1 vs 64% and 35% for group 2 respectively (p = 0.14). The 3-year and 5-year PFS rates were 32% and 21% for group 1 vs 12% and 8% for group 2 respectively (p = 0.009). Independent predictors of PFS in the debulking group were bilobar metastases (HR = 2.70; p = 0.02); the presence of extrahepatic metastasis (HR = 2.65, p = 0.03) and the presence of more than 9 metastases (HR = 2.37; p = 0.04). Iterative liver surgery for CRLM was a significant protective factor (HR = 0.34, p = 0.04). ConclusionAn aggressive palliative surgical approach may offer a survival benefit for selected patients with unresectable CRLM, without increasing the morbidity. The decision for surgery should be made on a case-by-case basis.

Multicenter randomized phase II study on S-1 and oxaliplatin therapy as an adjuvant after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (YCOG1001).

The high recurrence rate of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) after surgery remains a crucial problem. However, adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy for CRCLM has not yet been established. This study evaluated the efficacy of adjuvant therapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX). In a multicenter, randomized, phase II study, patients undergoing curative resection of CRCLM were randomly enrolled in a 1:1 ratio to either the low- or high-dose group. S-1 and oxaliplatin were administered from days 1 to 14 of a 3-week cycle as a 2-h infusion every 3weeks. The dose of S-1 was fixed at 80mg/m2. The doses in the low- and high-dose oxaliplatin groups were 100mg/m2 (low-dose group) and 130mg/m2 (high-dose group), respectively. This treatment was repeated eight times. The primary endpoint was the rate of discontinuation owing to toxicity. The secondary endpoints were the relapse-free survival (RFS) and frequency of adverse events (AEs). Between August 2010 and March 2015, 44 patients (low-dose group: 31 patients and high-dose group: 13 patients) were enrolled in the study. Of these, one patient was excluded from the efficacy analysis. In the high-dose group, five of nine patients were unable to continue the study due to toxicity in February 2013. At that time, recruitment to the high-dose group was stopped from the protocol. The relative dose intensity (RDI) for S-1 in the low- and high-dose groups were 49.8 and 48.7% (p = 0.712), and that for oxaliplatin was 75.9 and 73.0% (p = 0.528), respectively. The rates of discontinuation due to toxicity were 60 and 53.8% in the low- and high-dose groups, respectively, with no marked difference noted between the groups (p = 0.747). The frequency of grade ≥ 3 common adverse events was neutropenia (23.3%/23.1%), diarrhea (13.3%/15.4%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (6.7%/7.7%). The disease-free survival (DFS) at 3years was 52.9% in the low-dose group, which was not significantly different from that in the high-dose group (46.2%; p = 0.705). SOX regimens as adjuvant therapy after hepatectomy for CRCLM had high rates of discontinuation due to toxicity in both groups. In particular, the RDI of S-1 was < 50%. Therefore, the SOX regimen is not recommended as adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy for CRCLM.

Effect of Abdominal Aortic Calcification on Recurrence Following Initial Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

The aim of the study was to analyze the association between abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) and patient prognosis following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). AAC potentially reflects intrahepatic immunity and is involved in tumor development and progression. However, the clinical effects of AAC on colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis after curative-intent liver resection for CRLM remain unclear. We evaluated the effect of AAC on the clinical prognosis and metastatic patterns in 99 patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM between 2010 and 2019. The high-AAC group had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and remnant liver recurrence rate (RR) after propensity score matching to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics of patients and tumors. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, high AAC volume was an independent risk factor for poor OS and liver RR, but not poor lung RR. The expression of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, known as an anti-tumor marker, in liver natural killer (NK) cells was lower in the high-AAC group than in the low-AAC group. High AAC volume showed a strong relationship with remnant liver RR after curative resection of CRLM. High AAC volume may be responsible for the suppression of anti-tumor activity of liver NK cells, which results in an increased risk of liver recurrence and poor prognosis.

Local Therapy Improves Survival for Early Recurrence After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Early recurrence following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is associated with worse survival; yet, impact of further local therapy is unclear. We sought to evaluate whether local therapy benefits patients with early recurrence following hepatectomy for CLM. Clinicopathologic and survival outcomes of patients managed with hepatectomy for CLM (1/2001-12/2020) were queried from a prospectively maintained database. Timing of recurrence was stratified as early (recurrence-free survival [RFS] < 6months), intermediate (RFS 6-12months), and later (RFS > 12months). Local therapy was defined as ablation, resection, or radiation. Of 671 patients, 541 (81%) recurred with 189 (28%) early, 180 (27%) intermediate, and 172 (26%) later recurrences. Local therapy for recurrence resulted in improved survival, regardless of recurrence timing (early 78 vs. 32months, intermediate 72 vs. 39months, later 132 vs. 65months, all p < 0.001). Following recurrence, treatment with local therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.24), liver and extrahepatic recurrence (HR = 1.81), RAS + TP53 co-mutation (HR = 1.52), and SMAD4 mutation (HR = 1.92) were independently associated with overall survival (all p ≤ 0.002). Among patients with recurrence treated by local therapy, patients older than 65years (HR 1.79), liver and extrahepatic recurrence (HR 2.05), primary site or other recurrence (HR 1.90), RAS-TP53 co-mutation (HR 1.63), and SMAD4 mutation (HR 2.06) had shorter post-local therapy survival (all p ≤ 0.04). While most patients recur after hepatectomy for CLM, local therapy may result in long-term survival despite early recurrence. Somatic mutational profiling may help to guide the multidisciplinary consideration of local therapy after recurrence.

Operative technique of a robotic left hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases using the modified rubber-band technique.

Operative technique of a robotic left hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases using the modified rubber-band technique.

Occult Vertebral Fracture (OVF) in Patients Who Underwent Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Strong Association with Oncological Outcomes

Aim: The impact of occult vertebral fracture (OVF) on oncological outcomes after surgery has not been investigated, although its significance in orthopedics has been much debated recently. We evaluated the prognostic significance of OVF on the long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after hepatectomy. Methods: We included 140 patients with CRLM who underwent hepatectomy. OVF was identified using quantitative measurement and preoperative sagittal computed tomography image reconstruction from the 11th thoracic vertebra to the 5th lumber vertebra. Results: OVF was identified in 48 (34%) of the patients. In multivariate analysis, lymph node metastases (p &lt; 0.01), multiple tumors (p = 0.02), extrahepatic lesions (p &lt; 0.01), OVF (p &lt; 0.01), intraoperative bleeding (p = 0.04), and curability 1 or 2 (p &lt; 0.01) were independent and significant predictors of disease-free survival and extrahepatic lesions (p &lt; 0.01), osteosarcopenia (p = 0.02), and OVF (p &lt; 0.01) were independent and significant predictors of overall survival. A higher age, adjuvant chemotherapy for a primary lesion before metachronous liver metastases, osteopenia, and hypoalbuminemia were independent risk factors for OVF. Conclusions: The evaluation of preoperative OVF is a useful prognostic factor for risk stratification and clinical decision-making for patients with CRLM.

Factors of oncological failure in two stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

BackgroundTwo-stage hepatectomy (TSH) has increased the chance of surgical resections for bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Nevertheless, drop-out between stages and early recurrence rates raise the question of surgical futility in some situations. This study aimed to identify factors of TSH oncological failure. MethodsPatients with bilobar CRLM eligible for TSH in three tertiary centers between 2010 and 2021 were included, and divided in Failure and Success groups. Oncological failure was defined as failure of the second stage hepatectomy for tumor progression or recurrence within 6 months after resection. ResultsAmong 95 patients, 18 (18.9%) had hepatic progression between the two stages, and 7 (7.4%) failed to complete the second stage hepatectomy. After TSH, 31 (32.6%) patients experienced early recurrence. Overall, 38 (40.0%) patients experienced oncological failure (Failure group). The Failure group had lower median DFS (3 vs. 32 months, p < 0.001) and median OS (29 vs. 70 months, p = 0.045) than the Success group. On multivariable analysis, progression between the two stages in the future liver remnant (OR = 15.0 (3.22–113.0), p = 0.002), and maximal tumor size ≥40 mm in the future liver remnant (OR = 13.1 (2.12–117.0), p = 0.009) were independent factors of oncological failure. ConclusionRecurrence between the two stages and maximal tumor size ≥40 mm in the future liver remnant were associated with TSH failure for patients with bilobar CRLM.

Patient vulnerability is associated with poor prognosis following upfront hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis.

With the rapid aging of populations worldwide, the number of vulnerable patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer has increased. This study aimed to examine the association between vulnerability and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Consecutive 101 patients undergoing upfront hepatectomy for CRLM between 2004 and 2020 were included. The preoperative vulnerability was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ranging from one (very fit) to nine (terminally ill), and frailty was defined as a CFS score of ≥ 4. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was utilized to investigate associations of frailty with disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Of the 101 patients, 12 (12%) had frailty. Associations between frailty and surgical outcomes, namely, the incidence of 90-day mortality and postoperative complications, were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In the multivariable analyses, after adjusting for clinical risk scores calculated using six factors (timing of liver metastasis, primary tumor lymph node status, number of liver tumors, size of the largest tumor, extrahepatic metastatic disease, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level) to predict recurrence following hepatectomy for CRLM, preoperative frailty was found to be an independent risk factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR]:2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.72, P = 0.036), OS (HR:4.17, 95% CI 1.43-10.89, P = 0.011), and CSS (HR:3.49, 95% CI 1.09-9.60, P = 0.036). Preoperative frailty was associated with worse DFS, OS, and CSS after upfront hepatectomy for CRLM. Assessment and improvement of patient vulnerability may provide a favorable prognosis for patients with CRLM.

Robotic left hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases with modified rubber-band technique: surgical technique &amp; steps

Robotic left hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases with modified rubber-band technique: surgical technique &amp; steps

Optimal policy tree to assist in adjuvant therapy decision-making after resection of colorectal liver metastases

BackgroundAlthough systemic postoperative therapy after surgery for colorectal liver metastases is generally recommended, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has been debated. We used machine learning to develop a decision tree and define which patients may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. MethodsPatients who underwent curative-intent resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2000 and 2020 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. An optimal policy tree analysis was used to determine the optimal assignment of the adjuvant chemotherapy to subgroups of patients for overall survival and recurrence-free survival. ResultsAmong 1,358 patients who underwent curative-intent resection of colorectal liver metastases, 1,032 (76.0%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 28.7 months (interquartile range 13.7–52.0), 5-year overall survival was 67.5%, and 3-year recurrence-free survival was 52.6%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better recurrence-free survival (3-year recurrence-free survival: adjuvant chemotherapy, 54.4% vs no adjuvant chemotherapy, 46.8%; P < .001) but no overall survival significant improvement (5-year overall survival: adjuvant chemotherapy, 68.1% vs no adjuvant chemotherapy, 65.7%; P = .15). Patients were randomly allocated into 2 cohorts (training data set, n = 679, testing data set, n = 679). The random forest model demonstrated good performance in predicting counterfactual probabilities of death and recurrence relative to receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. According to the optimal policy tree, patient demographics, secondary tumor characteristics, and primary tumor characteristics defined the subpopulation that would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. ConclusionA novel artificial intelligence methodology based on patient, primary tumor, and treatment characteristics may help clinicians tailor adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations after colorectal liver metastases resection.

Perioperative disabilities in activities of daily living are associated with worse prognosis after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis

BackgroundThe number of vulnerable patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has increased. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between perioperative activities of daily living (ADL) and clinical outcomes after hepatectomy for CRLM. MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing resection of CRLM from 2004 to 2020 were included. Pre- or postoperative ADL was evaluated according to Barthel index (BI) scores, which range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent greater level of independence in ADL. Pre- or postoperative BI scores of ≤85 were defined as perioperative disabilities in ADL. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were utilised to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence interval (CI). ResultsA total of 218 patients were included, 16 (7.3%) revealed preoperative BI scores of ≤85, and 32 (15%) revealed postoperative BI scores of ≤85. In multivariate analyses, the perioperative disabilities in ADL were independently associated with shorter overall survival (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.10–3.31; P = 0.023) and cancer-specific survival (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.29–3.92; P = 0.006). ConclusionPerioperative disabilities in ADL were associated with poor prognosis following hepatectomy for CRLM. Improving preoperative vulnerability and preventing functional decline after surgery may provide a favourable prognosis for patients with CRLM.

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Incisional Hernia After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

BackgroundIncisional hernia (IH) is common after major abdominal surgery; however, the incidence after hepatectomy for cancer has not been described. We analyzed incidence of and risk factors for IH after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). MethodsPatients who underwent open hepatectomy with midline or reverse-L incision for CLM at a single institution between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative CT scans were reviewed to identify IH and the time from hepatectomy to hernia. Cumulative IH incidence was calculated using competing risk analysis. Risk factors were assessed using Cox proportional hazards model analysis. The relationship between IH incidence and preoperative body mass index (BMI) was estimated using a generalized additive model. ResultsAmong 470 patients (median follow-up: 16.9 months), IH rates at 12, 24, and 60 months were 41.5%, 51.0%, and 59.2%, respectively. Factors independently associated with IH were surgical site infection (HR: 1.54, 95% CI 1.16–2.06, P = 0.003) and BMI > 25 kg/m2 (HR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.45–2.61, P < 0.001). IH incidence was similar in patients undergoing midline and reverse-L incisions and patients who received and did not receive a bevacizumab-containing regimen. The 1-year IH rate increased with increasing number of risk factors (zero: 22.2%; one: 46.8%; two: 60.3%; P < 0.001). Estimated IH incidence was 10% for BMI of 15 kg/m2 and 80% for BMI of 40 kg/m2. ConclusionIH is common after open hepatectomy for CLM, particularly in obese patients and patients with surgical site infection. Surgeons should consider risk-mitigation strategies, including alternative fascial closure techniques.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: how do hepatectomy outcomes compare to liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma?

BackgroundThe incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) continues to rise, and hepatectomy is the only cure. Perioperative outcomes following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are better described than for ICC. The aim was to compare post-hepatectomy outcomes for ICC to CRLM and HCC. MethodsThe 2014–2020 ACS NSQIP hepatectomy PUF was utilized. Patients with ICC, CRLM, and HCC were identified and others excluded. Demographic, disease, and procedural characteristics were collected. Univariable and multivariable analyses (Chi-Square for categorical variables; Kruskal–Wallis for continuous variables) were performed for mortality, serious morbidity, bile leak, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), and 30-day readmission. Results17,789 patients underwent hepatectomy including 2377 for ICC, 10,195 for CRLM, and 5217 for HCC. Patients undergoing hepatectomy for ICC vs. HCC vs. CRLM were noted to have higher 30-day mortality (4.8% vs. 2.5% vs. 1.0%, respectively p < 0.05). ICC was associated with higher overall and serious morbidity, bile leak, severe PHLF, and readmission. Multivariable analyses confirmed higher odds ratios for mortality and morbidity (p < 0.05) in patients with ICC. ConclusionHepatectomy for ICC is associated with worse short-term outcomes than for CRLM or HCC. Surgeons should be aware of these risks during surgical planning.

Postoperative surveillance after surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: a cross-sectional study.

Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are associated with a high recurrence rate after surgery. There is paucity of high-quality evidence regarding the nature and overall benefit of surveillance after hepatectomy for CRLM. As part of a broader programme of research, this study aimed to assess current strategies for surveillance after liver resection for CRLM and outline surgeons' opinions regarding the benefit of postoperative surveillance. An online survey was sent to clinicians performing surgery for CRLM at tertiary hepatobiliary centres in the UK. There were responses from a total of 23 centres (88% response rate); 15/23 centres used standardised surveillance protocols for all patients. Most centres followed patients up at six months, but there is variation in postoperative surveillance at 3, 9, 18 and beyond 60 months. Patient comorbidities, indeterminate findings on imaging, margin status and assessment of recurrence risk were identified as the major factors influencing personalised surveillance strategies. There was clear clinician equipoise regarding the costs and benefits of surveillance. There is heterogeneity in postoperative follow-up for CRLM in the UK. High-quality prospective studies and randomised trials are necessary to elucidate the value of postoperative surveillance and identify optimal follow-up strategies.

The impact of recurrence timing and tumor burden score on overall survival among patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

Approximately 15% of patients experience a resectable intrahepatic recurrence after an index curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We sought to investigate the impact of recurrence timing and tumor burden score (TBS) at the time of recurrence on overall survival among patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy. Patients with CRLM who experienced recurrent intrahepatic disease after initial hepatectomy between 2000 and 2020 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. The impact of time-TBS, defined as TBS divided by the time interval of recurrence, was assessed relative to overall survival. Among 220 patients, the median age was 60.9 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 53.0-69.0), and 144 (65.5%) patients were male. Most patients experienced multiple recurrences (n = 120, 54.5%) within 12 months after the initial hepatectomy (n = 139, 63.2%). The median tumor size of the recurrent CRLM was 2.2 cm (IQR: 1.5-3.0 cm) with a median TBS of 3.5 (2.3-4.9) at the time of recurrence. Overall, 121 (55.0%) patients underwent repeat hepatectomy, whereas 99 (45.0%) individuals were treated with systemic chemotherapy or other nonsurgical treatments; repeat hepatectomy was associated with better postrecurrence survival (PRS) (p < 0.001). Three-year PRS incrementally worsened (low time-TBS:71.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 57.9-88.8 vs. medium: 63.6%, 95%CI, 47.7-84.8 vs. high: 49.2%, 95%CI, 31.1-77.7, p = 0.02) as time-TBS values increased. Each unit increase in time-TBS score was independently associated with a 41% higher possibility of death (hazard ratio: 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.90, p = 0.03). Time-TBS was associated with long-term outcomes after repeat hepatectomy for recurrent CRLM. Time-TBS may be an easy tool to help select patients who may benefit the most from repeat hepatic resection of recurrent CRLM.

Optimizing the future liver remnant: Portal vein embolization, hepatic venous deprivation, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy

Preservation of an adequate future liver remnant is paramount when planning any major liver resection and is of particular concern in the setting of bilateral colorectal liver metastases. Procedures including portal vein embolization and hepatic venous deprivation for one- or two-stage hepatectomy, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy have been developed to enable curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in patients with an initially insufficient future liver remnant.

Modeling the Prediction of Early Treatment Failure After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Modeling the Prediction of Early Treatment Failure After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Conditional Survival After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Results from the Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC).

Complete resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) improves long-term survival in colorectal cancer. However, there is limited recent data on conditional survival (CS) as postoperative survival milestones are achieved post-hepatectomy. A retrospective analysis was performed on the penta-institutional Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC), with 906 consecutive CLM hepatectomy cases. CS was calculated using Bayes' theorem and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Additional CS analyses were performed on additional clinicopathologic risk factors, including colon cancer laterality, KRAS mutation status, and extrahepatic disease. The 5-year CS was 40.6%, 45.3%, 52.8%, and 65.3% at 0, 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively, with significant improvements each year (p < 0.005). CS was not significantly different between right-sided and left-sided colorectal cancers by 3 years postoperatively. Patients with KRAS mutations had worse CS at all timepoints (p < 0.001). Extrahepatic disease was a poor prognostic factor for OS and CS (p < 0.001). However, CS for patients with KRAS mutations or extrahepatic disease improved significantly as 2-year, postoperative survival was achieved (p < 0.05). Five-year CS after hepatectomy for CLM improved with each passing year of survival postoperatively. Although extrahepatic disease and KRAS mutations are poor prognostic factors for OS, these populations still had improved CS after 2 years postoperatively.

Prevention of post-hepatectomy liver failure after major resection of colorectal liver metastases: is hepato-biliary scintigraphy the optimal tool?

Liver failure is the most threatening complication after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Recent studies indicate that liver functional evaluation by hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) could be more sensitive than volumetry to predict the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of 99mTc-mebrofenin HBS, when used as the main preoperative assessment before major hepatectomy in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. This retrospective study reviewed data from all patients with colorectal liver metastases treated at Montpellier Cancer Institute between 2013 and 2020. Only patients who underwent HBS before surgery were included. The primary aim was to evaluate how the use of this functional imaging modifies the surgical management of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Among the 80 patients included, 26 (32.5%) underwent two-stage hepatectomy and 13 (16.3%) repeated hepatectomies. Severe postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (20%) and all-grade liver failure occurred in 13 patients (16.3%). Seventeen patients (21.3%) underwent major liver surgery based on sufficient mebrofenin uptake, although the retrospectively evaluated future liver remnant (FLR) volume was insufficient (<30% of total liver). None of these patients had PHLF. This study showed the reliability of HBS for the preoperative functional assessment of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Indeed, it allowed performing major hepatectomy safely in 20% more patients who would not have been considered for surgery on the basis of volumetric assessment.